Mar 20, 2007, 12:33 AM // 00:33
|
#401
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai Nui
When I took a break for about 3 months this thread had already been a couple months old I believe. We're still discussing this? I think it's time to pack it up and say good bye to any reasonable Razah aquisition.
|
And yet, we'll keep complaining because such a flawed design shouldn't go untouched.
Putting the only Ritualist hero in the game behind a wall of "elitism"? what were they thinking? that's just stupid, as simple as that.
If you ask me, we should complain even more, we should do something to bring it to Anet's attention.
Something like bringing it up each time you see Gaile in your district, something to show them how annoying this is, something to put it on their priority list, it's not even hard to fix.
Last edited by Frozy; Mar 20, 2007 at 12:36 AM // 00:36..
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2007, 04:26 PM // 16:26
|
#402
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Guild: Is Gwen Eighteen [yet]
Profession: Mo/Me
|
/sign
Very reasonable! but need something come up as a solution as well!
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2007, 04:38 PM // 16:38
|
#403
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
|
hmmmmmmmmmm not sure bout this 1
|
|
|
Mar 20, 2007, 11:23 PM // 23:23
|
#404
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2006
Profession: W/Mo
|
I wrote off getting him after reading what is needed and trying. Elite players buy the gems and get him the easy way. The rest of us do without. Elites are the only ones gw cares about.
I accepted that fact and wrote off many things, like buying chapter 4.
|
|
|
Nov 03, 2007, 07:16 AM // 07:16
|
#405
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Feb 2007
Profession: Mo/W
|
omg why did this need to be bumped...
and why did i just bump it again...
|
|
|
Nov 03, 2007, 07:47 AM // 07:47
|
#406
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlwind
Meh i didn't bump, Im just trying to be part of a conversation theres a difference. Like when people post just to up their count instead of trying to discuss on a "discussion board"... I love how people worry about crap like that lol.
|
So you're increasing your post count by replying to posts over 6 months old?
Have you been hit on the head or have you always been stupid?
|
|
|
Nov 03, 2007, 08:03 AM // 08:03
|
#407
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
This thread is from the time when acquiring Razah required a -lot- of money in gemstones, and a trip to DoA.
|
|
|
Nov 03, 2007, 01:10 PM // 13:10
|
#408
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Astral Revenants
Profession: P/W
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlwind
Meh i didn't bump, Im just trying to be part of a conversation theres a difference. Like when people post just to up their count instead of trying to discuss on a "discussion board"... I love how people worry about crap like that lol.
|
...Is that a joke?
|
|
|
Nov 03, 2007, 02:54 PM // 14:54
|
#409
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ireland
Guild: Currently LF Active HA Guild, Glad 2, Comm.3, R2
Profession: E/
|
as said there were talking about how it used take 1 of each gemstone to do the razah quest. hence elitism, they were worth more back then
|
|
|
Nov 03, 2007, 03:24 PM // 15:24
|
#410
|
Krytan Explorer
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onarik Amrak
...Is that a joke?
|
Im guessing not
|
|
|
Nov 03, 2007, 05:16 PM // 17:16
|
#411
|
of Brackenwood
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
I know in Sardelac we sometimes encourage bumping an existing thread rather than making a new thread with the same topic, but this is different. The Razah aquisition has LONG been corrected by A-net. There is no need to bump a thread that's completely irrelevant to today's Guild Wars version.
In fact, since you admit your just trying to raise your post count, I'm going to delete your posts from this thread to reduce your post count. Don't do that again, m'kay?
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM // 23:30.
|